Redpath Bulletins & Articles



HOME
HORTICULTURAL STRUCTURES
GREENHOUSE ACCESSORIES
ECOSHELTER - STOCK SHELTERS
PLASTIC FILMS & 
HORTI-TEXTILES
INDUSTRIAL COVERS
CATALOGUE REQUEST
ABOUT REDPATH
TRADE ENQUIRIES
USEFUL LINKS
CONTACT US
CURRENCY CALCULATOR
SECURE ORDER FORM
    BULLETINS & ARTICLES

    Tomato Product Group

Climate change update - Carbon Tax Scrapped (for now)

Business Manager: Ken Robertson

Article reproduced with permission of David Peterson and Peter Cooper, Vegfed NZ

Our minister responsible for Climate Change Issues David Parker announced 21 December that the Government will not be proceeding with the Carbon Tax in the first commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol and will instead consider other ways to ensure NZ meets its commitments to cut greenhouse gas emissions. The end-of-year review advised that the proposed carbon tax would not cut emissions enough to justify its introduction. (Also the coalition agreement with peter Dunne and the support agreement with Winston Peters requires a review and both had made it clear that they would not support the tax in Parliament.)

The Government has now asked officials to undertake further policy work, in consultation with stakeholders, due to be reported back to ministers in March. Policies linked to carbon tax, such as Negotiated Greenhouse Agreements for major energy users emitters, are likely to be retained in some form. The review also highlighted some forestry, land use and agriculture policies that need refinement to ensure they help cut emissions.

David Parker said some areas that officials would report back on in March include:

• Incentivising investment in renewable energy;

• Encouraging new tree planting and reducing deforestation;

• Improving fuel efficiency of the transport fleet;

• Assessing options for a narrow-based carbon tax on major energy users and emitters who do not meet world best practice;

• Improving energy efficiency and conservation.

With the tax now abandoned, continuation of NGA’s in some form is seen by many large industrial emitters as necessary to demonstrate industry action and to act as an insurance policy should a tax be revived by a future government. Industry representatives are generally relieved there is no announcement (yet) of a move towards emissions trading because of the many allocation problems and the likelihood it will be nearly as costly as a tax (perhaps even more so, according to one Australian study).

The fourth bulleted point above: “Assessing options for a narrow-based carbon tax on major energy users and emitters who do not meet world best practice” should send a clear signal to all heated greenhouse producers that they are not ‘off the hook yet’.

Government announcement re carbon tax welcomed

In our media release on 21 December Brian Gargiulo said:

‘The horticulture industry has welcomed the Government’s announcement that it will not be proceeding with its proposed carbon tax.

The announcement is great news and will be appreciated by growers throughout New Zealand as a positive step toward ensuring the horticulture industry, worth an annual $NZ4.7 billion to the New Zealand economy, remains competitive and sustainable. We have been very concerned as to the negative impacts of the proposed tax on growers’ businesses, with particular regards to maintaining our international competitiveness.

Energy is an essential component to the horticulture industry – from areas like heating within the greenhouse industry, cultivation of land, irrigating crops, right through to packing, storage, processing and transportation of horticulture products to markets.

Because of rising energy costs, we believe most growers have already taken significant steps towards creating and maintaining energy efficient businesses. For these growers the tax would simply have been an additional cost that couldn’t be recovered and this would not have driven behaviour change.

The horticulture industry would welcome the opportunity to work with Government to further improve energy efficiency whilst ensuring businesses remain competitive.

INDEPENDENT REVIEW CONFIRMS KYOTO PROJECTED SHORTFALL
An independent review of New Zealand’s Kyoto liabilities confirms the Governments revised estimates of a 36 million tonne CO² deficit compared to its baseline emissions allocation over the period 2008-12. UK consultants AEA Technology found the estimates of how Kyoto forests will contribute to removing CO² from the atmosphere to be “generally sound and reasonable.” It agrees with the Government’s 25% downward revision in likely forest sink credits. This is partly because trees planted on former scrub land (a difficult judgement) are not eligible for carbon credits but it also reflects a marked drop in the rate of new forest planting.

The reviewers note two main areas which could cause further revisions to the projections: changing land use and energy demand in the transport sector. The review suggests the worst case scenarios for deforestation and afforestation may be too optimistic. It also criticises the modelling of energy demand and emissions in the transport sector as somewhat simplistic.

GREENHOUSE INDUSTRY ENERGY EFFICIENCIES
The Tomato and Fresh Vegetable product Groups’ and SFF funded projects: Energy Efficiencies in Greenhouse Production and Improving Crop Productivity in Greenhouses need to continue to their fruition and individual growers need to keep their focus on cost effective ways to save money.

TOMATO IMPORTS
A total of 3,840,660kgs of tomatoes, with a value of $9.16million were imported for the year ending 30 November 2005.

The figures for October and November were 132,360kgs and 23,040kgs respectively.

The annual figure of 3,841 tonnes is down 10% on the previous year’ total of 4,239 tonnes while the value is almost the same at just over $9.0million.

TOMATO EXPORTS
Tomato Exports for the calendar year to 30 November were 2,885,592kgs valued at $7.25million. For the same period in 2004 the figures were 1,547,548kgs and $6.16Million.

The monthly volumes for October and November were 120,275 and 287,089kgs respectively, up 82% on the same period in 2004


BACK TO BULLETINS & ARTICLES

.